Semantics and Pragmatics


Vol 7 (2014)

Main Articles

A discourse model for überhaupt PDF
Tania Rojas-Esponda 1:1-45
Varieties of update PDF
Sarah E. Murray 2:1-53
Bound 'de re' pronouns and the LFs of attitude reports PDF
Simon Charlow, Yael Sharvit 3:1-43
Contrast and the structure of discourse PDF
Maziar Toosarvandani 4:1-57
Dependent indefinites and their post-suppositions PDF
Robert Henderson 6:1-58
Mixed quotation: The grammar of apparently transparent opacity PDF
Emar Maier 7:1-67
Disfluencies as intra-utterance dialogue moves PDF
Jonathan Ginzburg, Raquel Fernández, David Schlangen 9:1-64
Epistemic modals and context: Experimental data PDF
Joshua Knobe, Seth Yalcin 10:1-21
Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity PDF
Benjamin Spector 11:1-61

Squibs, Remarks, and Replies

Cancelling the Maxim of Quantity: Another challenge for a Gricean theory of Scalar Implicatures PDF
Danny Fox 5:1-20
Typicality made familiar: A commentary on Geurts and van Tiel (2013) PDF
Chris Cummins 8:1-15

Vol 6 (2013)

Main Articles

Modals with a taste of the deontic PDF
Joshua Knobe, Zoltán Gendler Szabó 1:1-42
Strategic Conversation PDF
Nicholas Asher, Alex Lascarides 2:1-62
Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers PDF
Elizabeth Coppock, Thomas Brochhagen 3:1-57
'And' or 'or': General use coordination in ASL PDF
Kathryn Davidson 4:1-44
It's that, and that's it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and definites) PDF
Daniel Büring, Manuel Kriz 6:1-29
Epistemics and attitudes PDF
Pranav Anand, Valentine Hacquard 8:1-59
Embedded scalars PDF
Bart Geurts, Bob van Tiel 9:1-37
Experimenting with the king of France: Topics, verifiability and definite descriptions PDF
Márta Abrusán, Kriszta Szendrői 10:1-43

Squibs, Remarks, and Replies

A note on presupposition accommodation PDF
Roni Katzir, Raj Singh 5:1-16
N-words and sentential negation: Evidence from polarity particles and VP ellipsis PDF
Adrian Brasoveanu, Donka Farkas, Floris Roelofsen 7:1-33

Vol 5 (2012)

Main Articles

Presuppositions, provisos, and probability PDF
Daniel Lassiter 2:1-37
The meaning of plural definites: A decision-theoretic approach PDF
Sophia A. Malamud 3:1-58
Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds PDF
Dilip Ninan 5:1-57
Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics PDF
Craige Roberts 6:1-69
Information Structure: Afterword PDF
Craige Roberts 7:1-19
Contrastive topics decomposed PDF
Michael Wagner 8:1-54

Squibs, Remarks, and Replies

Two types of class B numeral modifiers: A reply to Nouwen 2010 PDF
Bernhard Schwarz, Brian Buccola, Michael Hamilton 1:1-25
Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study PDF
Valentine Hacquard, Alexis Wellwood 4:1-29

Vol 4 (2011)

Main Articles

Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation PDF
Michael Franke 1:1-82
Explaining presupposition projection with dynamic semantics PDF
Daniel Rothschild 3:1-43
Wh-islands in degree questions: A semantic approach PDF
Márta Abrusán 5:1-44
Another argument for embedded scalar implicatures based on oddness in downward entailing environments PDF
Giorgio Magri 6:1-51
Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles PDF
Corien Bary, Dag Trygve Truslew Haug 8:1-56

Squibs, Remarks, and Replies

Exhaustivity in questions with non-factives PDF
Daniel Rothschild, Nathan Klinedinst 2:1-23
Operators or restrictors? A reply to Gillies PDF
Justin Khoo 4:1-25
Modification in non-combining idioms PDF
Scott McClure 7:1-7

Vol 3 (2010)

Main Articles

Quantifiers in Than-Clauses PDF
Sigrid Beck 1:1-72
Two kinds of modified numerals PDF
Rick Nouwen 3:1-41
Iffiness PDF
Anthony S Gillies 4:1-42
The semantics and pragmatics of plurals PDF
Henriëtte de Swart, Donka Farkas 6:1-54
Varieties of conventional implicature PDF
Eric Scott McCready 8:1-57
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood PDF
Lisa Matthewson 9:1-74
Free choice permission as resource-sensitive reasoning PDF
Chris Barker 10:1-38

Squibs, Remarks, and Replies

Embedded Implicatures and Experimental Constraints: A Reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla PDF
Uli Sauerland 2:1-13
Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories PDF
Michela Ippolito 5:1-15
Embedded implicatures observed: a comment on Geurts and Pouscoulous (2009) PDF
Charles Clifton, Chad Dube 7:1-13
Conjunctive interpretations of disjunctions PDF
Robert van Rooij 11:1-28

Vol 2 (2009)

Main Articles

Universal Implicatures and Free Choice Effects: Experimental Data PDF
Emmanuel Chemla 2:1-33
Local Contexts PDF
Philippe Schlenker 3:1-78
Embedded implicatures?!? PDF
Bart Geurts, Nausicaa Pouscoulous 4:1-34

Squibs, Remarks, and Replies

Bishop Sentences and Donkey Cataphora: A Response to Barker and Shan PDF
Paul David Elbourne 1:1-7
Free choice for all: a response to Emmanuel Chemla PDF
Bart Geurts, Nausicaa Pouscoulous 5:1-10

Vol 1 (2008)

Main Articles

Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding PDF
Chris Barker, Chung-chieh Shan 1:1-46

Forthcoming articles

Neg-raising and positive polarity: The view from modals
Vincent Homer
The semantics and pragmatics of epistemic modals
Sarah Moss
The Ingredients of Comparison: The semantics of the excessive construction in Japanese
Xiao Li
Sentence-internal "same" and its quantificational licensors: A new window into the processing of inverse scope
Adrian Brasoveanu and Jakub Dotlaci
The role of givenness, presupposition, and prosody in Czech word order: An experimental study
Radek Šimík and Marta Wierzba
Chimerical conditionals
Itamar Francez
The Degree Semantics Parameter and cross-linguistic variation
M. Ryan Bochnak
Dual Content Semantics, privative adjectives, and dynamic compositionality
Guillermo Del Pinal
Incremental quantification and the dynamics of pair-list phenomena
Dylan Bumford
Moral asymmetries and the semantics of "many"
Paul Egré and Florian Cova
A "de-Fregean" semantics (and neo-Gricean pragmatics) for modified and unmodified numerals
Christopher Kennedy

About the Journal

Semantics and Pragmatics (S&P) is published by the Linguistic Society of America (LSA). It is a fully open-access peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality, original, self-contained research articles on the semantics and pragmatics of natural languages. In 2013, in its sixth year of publication, Semantics & Pragmatics became one of only two full journals of the LSA, alongside the society’s flagship journal, Language. There are no publication fees of any kind for publication in S&P.

While the core target audience of Semantics & Pragmatics is academic linguists, we also publish material by, or of relevance to, philosophers, psychologists, and computer scientists. Papers must include new results of interest to those working in semantics and pragmatics, and must demonstrate clear significance for theoretical development of those areas. Provided the work meets those criteria, we welcome both submissions of papers on core topics in semantics and pragmatics, and submissions of interdisciplinary papers involving work on syntax, phonology, psycho-linguistics, text and corpus studies, discourse and conversation analysis, computational semantics, the lexicon, historical linguistics, cross-linguistic typology, logic, and philosophy of language.

We strongly encourage all readers and prospective authors to register, which will let us send you email notifications of new articles. Other ways of staying in touch with the journal are the RSS newsfeed that you can subscribe to with your favorite newsreader, S&P's Facebook page, S&P on Twitter, and our editors' blog.

Our pilot issue (Vol. 0, 2007) contained an inaugural editorial explaining the concepts behind the journal.

We do not require any particular format for initial submissions (except requiring that the submission be a pdf file).

Once your paper is accepted, it will be typeset in LaTeX in S&P's house style. While we do not require final submission in LaTeX format, we do strongly encourage authors to submit in LaTeX and furthermore to use our LaTeX package. We do provide typesetting services for authors of accepted articles that are not in LaTeX format. However, as explained here, Word submissions will take much longer to reach the publication stage.

We would be grateful for any comments and feedback on the journal and this website. You can send us email or visit our editors' blog and leave a comment there.